Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 28
November 28
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- File:Nenjam.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no evidence that the public domain claim is correct. See Commons:COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Image is almost certainly unfree, but if we knew the source to properly attribute it, we could keep it under WP:NFCC, since it's a movie poster. —C.Fred (talk) 15:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Note this was uploaded by a now blocked sockpuppet. Fiddle Faddle 09:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. The image does have a fair-use rationale as I write this, so the question becomes: is a rationale and a tag sufficient? NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 09:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- See WP:CSD#G5: contributions by sockpuppets are not accepted on Wikipedia. Therefore, the image will probably be deleted soon. However, someone else could choose to contribute an image for the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note that this image is unused in any article. Fiddle Faddle 12:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.