Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Murder of Betty Hudson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 22:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Murder of Betty Hudson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable cold murder case. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I concur, particularly after checking out the forum that the article creator listed as a link at one point. This case is pretty apparently just another unsolved murder that for whatever reason has sparked a very minor amount of interest at a forum due to a recent anniversary. I will happily re-evaluate if efforts are made to establish notability. Erechtheus (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; without major sources, it's not notable. If it is considered that a serial killer did it, then said serial killer may get an article, under whatever tag the police and press have come up with to label her.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no attribution of notability to independent sources, one of hundreds (thousands?) of unsolved murders every year in the U.S. --Dhartung | Talk 19:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, While sad, Wikipedia is not the place for it. KleenupKrew (talk) 02:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a memorial or a webhost. Plainly the creator wants to drum up publicity for the case, and I sympathize, but that's what Myspace is for. RGTraynor 13:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Should be speedily deleted (for the fourth time) - a sad case obviously, but not notable without RS. ukexpat (talk) 15:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - and protect the article name and Betty Hudson in view of the creator's comments on the article talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 19:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - tragic, but (alas!) not notable. The page creator's stated motivations are in strenuous opposition to everything we're trying to do here, especially WP:BLP and WP:NPOV! --Orange Mike | Talk 18:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.