Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Irelandd: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→User talk:Irelandd: reply |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Comment''' - {{tq|By default, constructively contributing Wikipedians should be honored with a listing at WP:RIP. Criteria for placement on the Deceased Wikipedian page has not been discussed, although by common sense listed users should have been active enough to be considered part of the community.}} Tell me how 20 edits on one's own article is "active enough to be part of the community" [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 03:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' - {{tq|By default, constructively contributing Wikipedians should be honored with a listing at WP:RIP. Criteria for placement on the Deceased Wikipedian page has not been discussed, although by common sense listed users should have been active enough to be considered part of the community.}} Tell me how 20 edits on one's own article is "active enough to be part of the community" [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 03:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
:* A single useful contribution makes a contributor. All contributors are valuable to the project. A userpage memorial tag is the smallest show of respect. It also happens to be useful to other wikipedians, even if you don't care to show respect for the dead. --[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 08:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
:* A single useful contribution makes a contributor. All contributors are valuable to the project. A userpage memorial tag is the smallest show of respect. It also happens to be useful to other wikipedians, even if you don't care to show respect for the dead. --[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 08:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::We are an encyclopedia, not a place to "respect the dead". You clearly misunderstand the function of Wikipedia, and I have no reason to "respect" a random person I've never met and never heard of, and you don't either. You simply have no standing to make your argument other than the fact that "I'm a bad person" because I don't agree with you. Disingenuous nonsense, by the way. [[User:MSJapan|MSJapan]] ([[User talk:MSJapan|talk]]) 18:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:56, 23 September 2016
Another NOTMEMORIAL issue - user has less than 20 edits on two days (on his own article only, no less, which we don't allow), there was no content on his user page to begin with, and it's memorial templated for all eternity? We used to have activity requirements for these things. MSJapan (talk) 01:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure why, but this notice set on the talk page, and it should not have. I can't fix it, but it should be on the userpage. MSJapan (talk) 01:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. We should welcome people wanting to contribute to their Wikipedia biographies, especially welcoming when they do so under a registered username overtly disclosing their identity. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians/Guidelines and "Consider archiving any unseemly disputes, warnings or deletion notices" Thincat (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment -
By default, constructively contributing Wikipedians should be honored with a listing at WP:RIP. Criteria for placement on the Deceased Wikipedian page has not been discussed, although by common sense listed users should have been active enough to be considered part of the community.
Tell me how 20 edits on one's own article is "active enough to be part of the community" MSJapan (talk) 03:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- A single useful contribution makes a contributor. All contributors are valuable to the project. A userpage memorial tag is the smallest show of respect. It also happens to be useful to other wikipedians, even if you don't care to show respect for the dead. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- We are an encyclopedia, not a place to "respect the dead". You clearly misunderstand the function of Wikipedia, and I have no reason to "respect" a random person I've never met and never heard of, and you don't either. You simply have no standing to make your argument other than the fact that "I'm a bad person" because I don't agree with you. Disingenuous nonsense, by the way. MSJapan (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2016 (UTC)