Kumi-da

How to denote missing details on a wiki for other contributors?

I would like to denote missing details on certain wiki pages so contributors can be notified of the same when visiting the page. I notice few wiki articles missing images, I would like to denote that this is missing similar to the {citation-needed} tag for missing citations.

Please guide me on the templates to be used and other details around the same.

Rahul-kumi (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

You could add {{Photo requested}} on the article talk page describing what photo(s) would be helpful. Also, many WikiProject templates on talk pages have a parameter like |needs-image= or |needs-photo= that you could add and set to "yes". Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 03:07, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion GoingBatty, will use the options that you have suggested. Rahul-kumi (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

There are a lot of maintenance templates (or tags) relating to content. You can dive into them by exploring Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates.

For images, though, there's a different approach. Perehaps you'd primarily want to use {{image requested}} on the talk page of the article - emphasis that the template belongs on the talk page - and there are some related templates for phtotos, maps, charts, {{audio requested}}, infobox, etc.

Don't go crazy putting tags in every place where something could be added. Use them sparingly, aiming for the places where fulfilling the request would make a large difference in the quality of an article. Also, if an article already has tags, there is little need to pour more on. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion jmcgnh, I will explore the Wikipedia maintenance templates and sparingly add requests for media inclusions where ever these might add value articles. Rahul-kumi (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Shyamal's Welcome

Hello Rahul-kumi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shyamal (talk) 04:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC) Thank you for this welcome kit @Shyamal! This seems pretty extensive!! Looking forward to contribute more!! Rahul-kumi (talk) 14:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC) (edit conflict) There are a lot of maintenance templates (or tags) relating to content. You can dive into them by exploring Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates. For images, though, there's a different approach. You'd primarily want to use {{image requested}} on the talk page of the article, and there are some related templates for maps, charts, {{audio requested}}, infobox, etc. Don't go crazy putting tags in every place where something could be needed. Use them sparingly, aiming for the places where fulfilling the request would make a large difference in the quality of an article. Also, if an article already has tags, there is little need to pour more on. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kumi-da/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Kumi-da! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ficus krishnae has been accepted

Ficus krishnae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 20:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

@KylieTastic,

Thanks for you reveiws on the draft article and your valuable assistance in promoting this work from my sandbox to a main article!!

- Kumi-da (talk) 02:57, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your welcome :) KylieTastic (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2025 (UTC)