Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Base (platform)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While a surface reading of the !votes would normally lead to no consensus, given the BLP implications of the article's content, the consensus is to delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:00, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Base (platform) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing significant available for the company that can establish any sort of notability, lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Meeanaya (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thoughts - I'm not sure this should accurately be considered a social media platform. It's more like an organisation that primarily uses a social media platform to communicate and exist. The sources mainly consider someone to be joining an organisation called the Base, which has a social media platform. I think if it was rewritten to be premised like that, it would be notable. As it is now, it's somewhat misleading. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I was just going by the earliest report, as "Vice" calls it the name of a social networking platform. Would the term describing a group refer to all users of the platform or only some? I remember years ago silliness like "hacker known as 4chan" (that too is a platform, not a person or group) and don't want to jump to any conclusions. Olivia comet (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.