Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La commedia di Amos Poe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and no votes for deletion. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 08:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- La commedia di Amos Poe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable film with only one source and does not seem to meet the criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NFILM - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Even if only through Italian language sources, WP:NF is met. Simply having "only one source" is not a proper deletion rationale, as notability is found through sources being available, and not through a use or not to cite an article, and would thus call for diligent WP:BEFORE to find and add the sources through regular editing... which is what I have BEGUN doing. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Having only one source is an absolutely a vaild deletion rationale as it goes to the point that notability isn't established through one source. Regardless you have provided more sources which I cannot verify and withdraw the AFD nomination. If this not closed by the time I get to an actual computer I will close it.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- I appreciate your withdrawal, but can only refute by saying that after a diligent search IF ONLY one source were available anywhere (online or off) or in any language, then yes we'd probably have a failure of WP:NF. But speaking as someone who looks and tries to improve articles, I fall back on WP:NRVE and contend that an article having only with one source is not a consideration listed at WP:DEL#REASON. I was happy to improve it some. Thank you. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Having only one source is an absolutely a vaild deletion rationale as it goes to the point that notability isn't established through one source. Regardless you have provided more sources which I cannot verify and withdraw the AFD nomination. If this not closed by the time I get to an actual computer I will close it.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.