Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local Government ICT Network
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Local Government ICT Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for web content or the general notability guideline. (Contested A7].) – hysteria18 (talk) 16:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added some sources and soon a book from the Gauteng Legislature with a paper from the Network will be published. As stated before the network is very relevant, active, well funded and participating in all public sector IT events in South Africa. I can really not understand why this should not fulfill the notability guidelines. Please don't make participating in Wikipedia harder than necessary Istvanst (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Bmusician 03:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.